MIDWEEK REPORTER
MASVINGO-Citizens are speaking out against the Constitutional Amendment (No. 3) Bill, citing concerns over the process and substance of the proposed changes.
The government has scheduled public hearings from March 30 to April 2, but many feel the timeframe and venues are inaccessible, particularly for rural communities, The Midweek Watch has learnt.
Citizens in Action Southern Africa (CIASA) notes with concern the growing community resistance ahead of the public hearings.
However, the bill’s proposals, includes extending terms of office and increasing executive influence over key institutions, have sparked fears of weakened accountability and reduced citizen participation.
Community members, like Calvin Muvheyi, a human rights defender, demand a more inclusive process, “We want to be heard, but the process must allow us to participate.”
Tatenda Mandondo, CIASA Programs Officer, expressed concern over Constitutional Amendment Bill 3 proceedings, stating, “Our main concern is the composition of the bill and the way hearings are being held. It’s no longer a public hearing but a charade of misinformation by parliament, disregarding public voices.”
He added, “In Bulawayo, students from ZINASU were abducted as well as in Hwedza and Chitungwiza. People are being tortured and silenced. It’s not a hearing but a political rally. In different venues, ZANU PF jingles are played, in a scenario where it’s supposed to be non-partisan.”
Mundondo emphasized, “As an organization, we’re very concerned about these developments. We wish for these hearings to happen in a stable and non-violent environment.”
Reports of opposition leaders and activists facing arrests or harassment for expressing dissent have further constrained civic space.
CIASA calls for expanded public hearings, respect for citizens’ rights, and reconsideration of provisions that weaken democratic accountability.
The outcome of this process will impact Zimbabwe’s governance and human rights landscape.
As CIASA emphasizes, constitutional amendments must be rooted in broad-based, inclusive participation. The question remains: will the government listen to its citizens?
